<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for All In Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allinlearning.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allinlearning.com</link>
	<description>Developing life-long learners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:31:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Deep Structure vs Surface Structure: An Example from Andy Griffith by pete barcenez</title>
		<link>http://www.allinlearning.com/archives/164/comment-page-1#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>pete barcenez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://demo.allinlearning.com/?p=164#comment-65</guid>
		<description>That is a very good analogy.  So might I assume that deep structure concepts are those intangible learning by-products that occur when a student is able to grasp the primary deep structure concepts of critical decision making and application and synthesis activities (within the Bloom&#039;s realm). 

So If I can consider Higher order thinking skills as a deeper structure, I would hope that a student would be able to utilize this skillset regardless of the course or curriculum. 

My comment is based on the fact that I am a Technology director trying to rethink our professional development offerings, and wanting my trainers to dig deeper and use instructional technology as more of a tool set rather than a topic. 

I don&#039;t necessarily want our training to stop at showing teachers how to incorporate digital cameras in their materials,for example, but rather I would want the end result to be for a student to recognize the need for digital photographs themselves and use that skill as an everyday tool.  

I probably got too far off base on this one. let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a very good analogy.  So might I assume that deep structure concepts are those intangible learning by-products that occur when a student is able to grasp the primary deep structure concepts of critical decision making and application and synthesis activities (within the Bloom&#8217;s realm). </p>
<p>So If I can consider Higher order thinking skills as a deeper structure, I would hope that a student would be able to utilize this skillset regardless of the course or curriculum. </p>
<p>My comment is based on the fact that I am a Technology director trying to rethink our professional development offerings, and wanting my trainers to dig deeper and use instructional technology as more of a tool set rather than a topic. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily want our training to stop at showing teachers how to incorporate digital cameras in their materials,for example, but rather I would want the end result to be for a student to recognize the need for digital photographs themselves and use that skill as an everyday tool.  </p>
<p>I probably got too far off base on this one. let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
